Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ferring B.V.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ferring B.V. currently has 3 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are spread across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. SIFFORD, JEFFREY MARK is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending action. This 1:1:1 ratio between actions, examiners, and art units indicates a highly decentralized prosecution profile.

Each pending matter is being evaluated by a unique examiner within a unique art unit, requiring the company to manage three separate sets of examination standards and timelines. The involvement of 3 distinct art units suggests that the technical subject matter of the three applications is sufficiently different to require different specialized groups within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector.

The prosecution of these 3 pending actions will likely follow different paths due to the lack of overlap in personnel. This diversity in the examination process means that the company must be prepared for different sets of prior art and different interpretations of patentability. Practitioners should monitor the 3 distinct examiners closely, as no single individual holds a majority of the pending workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIFFORD, JEFFREY MARK 1 55.1% +32.8%
BRADLEY, CHRISTINA 1 62.6% +33.3%
HOWARD, ZACHARY C 1 63.9% +37.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18266159 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION BRADLEY, CHRISTINA 22d
18556625 BACTERIOPHAGE THERAPY AGAINST ADHERENT-INVASIVE ESCHERICHIA COLI SIFFORD, JEFFREY MARK —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18266159 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION BRADLEY, CHRISTINA 22d
18556625 BACTERIOPHAGE THERAPY AGAINST ADHERENT-INVASIVE ESCHERICHIA COLI SIFFORD, JEFFREY MARK —
18009469 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOUND FOR THE TREATMENT OF ATHEROSCLEROTIC CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE HOWARD, ZACHARY C —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1671 1
1654 1
1674 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18556625 BACTERIOPHAGE THERAPY AGAINST ADHERENT-INVASIVE ESCHERICHIA COLI SIFFORD, JEFFREY MARK 1671 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 20, 2023
18266159 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION BRADLEY, CHRISTINA 1654 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jun 08, 2023
18009469 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOUND FOR THE TREATMENT OF ATHEROSCLEROTIC CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE HOWARD, ZACHARY C 1674 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 09, 2022

Managing Ferring B.V.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Ferring B.V. have?

Ferring B.V. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Ferring B.V. applications?

Jeffrey Mark Sifford has the most, with 1 of Ferring B.V.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Ferring B.V.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month