Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Field AI Inc. maintains a patent portfolio focused on the Computing & Software technology area. The company currently faces 1 pending office action, which is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a singular point of focus for the company's current legal efforts within the broader software sector.
The prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner, HONORE, EVEL NMN. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action, representing the total current workload for the portfolio. Because there is a single examiner involved, the company's immediate prosecution strategy is entirely concentrated on this individual interaction.
Practitioners can focus their strategy on this interaction within the Computing & Software sector. With the current pending office action and distinct art unit, the portfolio's activity is highly streamlined. The outcome of the company's current patent efforts depends on the resolution of this action with the identified examiner. This concentrated workload allows for a dedicated focus on the specific examiner's preferences within the Computing & Software field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HONORE, EVEL NMN | 1 | 51.9% | +26.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19045594 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UNCERTAINTY-AWARE TRAVERSABILITY ESTIMATION WITH OPTIMUM-FIDELITY SCAN DATA | HONORE, EVEL NMN | 5d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2142 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19045594 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UNCERTAINTY-AWARE TRAVERSABILITY ESTIMATION WITH OPTIMUM-FIDELITY SCAN DATA | HONORE, EVEL NMN | 2142 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Feb 05, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial