Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Filuta AI Inc. is currently handling 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This matter is assigned to the distinct examiner, PRESSLY, KURT NICHOLAS, within a distinct art unit. As the busiest examiner, PRESSLY, KURT NICHOLAS is responsible for 1 pending office action, representing the entirety of the company's active prosecution.
This consolidated arrangement means that the outcome of the current prosecution depends on the interpretation of an individual within a specific technical department. For a practitioner, this environment suggests that building a consistent rapport with PRESSLY, KURT NICHOLAS is a primary factor in navigating the USPTO. The absence of multiple distinct examiners or art units reduces the complexity of tracking various examiner preferences. Consequently, the company's immediate patent strategy is tied to the progress of this individual application. The focused nature of the portfolio allows for a streamlined approach to addressing any technical rejections.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRESSLY, KURT NICHOLAS | 1 | 34.5% | +20.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18761037 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SPECIFICATION, CODIFICATION, AND DEPLOYMENT OF COMPOSITE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | PRESSLY, KURT NICHOLAS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18761037 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SPECIFICATION, CODIFICATION, AND DEPLOYMENT OF COMPOSITE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | PRESSLY, KURT NICHOLAS | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2125 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18761037 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SPECIFICATION, CODIFICATION, AND DEPLOYMENT OF COMPOSITE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | PRESSLY, KURT NICHOLAS | 2125 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialFiluta AI Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Kurt Nicholas Pressly has the most, with 1 of Filuta AI Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
