Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Finecs Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. The portfolio's active prosecution is limited to this administrative path. This concentration means that the outcome of the company's active patent efforts depends on the findings of a specific administrative group. The applicant can focus resources on a specific technical dialogue. This approach ensures that feedback is filtered through a specific professional perspective within the 1 distinct art unit.
MINH N TRINH is the busiest examiner for the company, overseeing 1 pending office action. Because the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner is responsible for all current activity. The use of 1 distinct art unit suggests the technology is categorized within a specialized group at the office. For the applicant, this suggests a focused prosecution environment where consistency in examiner communication is paramount. The limited scope of 1 distinct examiner simplifies the management of the current portfolio. Understanding the specific tendencies of the assigned examiner is the most critical factor for success in this 1 pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRINH, MINH N | 1 | 85.5% | +9.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18030018 | PIN ARRAYING DEVICE, ARRAY FOR PIN ARRAYING, AND PIN ARRAYING METHOD | TRINH, MINH N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3729 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18030018 | PIN ARRAYING DEVICE, ARRAY FOR PIN ARRAYING, AND PIN ARRAYING METHOD | TRINH, MINH N | 3729 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 08, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialFinecs Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Minh N Trinh has the most, with 1 of Finecs Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
