Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Finextech (Pty) Ltd. currently manages a company patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution landscape for this entity is characterized by a point of interaction at the patent office involving 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is assigned to a distinct examiner, ensuring that the current examination process is consolidated under a reviewer.
The technical review is confined to a distinct art unit, which aligns with the specialized nature of the Chemistry & Materials sector. CAM N NGUYEN is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding a busiest examiner pending office action. This individual is currently the examiner responsible for the workload recorded for the company.
For the active prosecution currently underway, the strategy is focused on the art unit involved. Having CAM N NGUYEN as the busiest examiner suggests that the immediate future of the portfolio's growth depends on the specific feedback from this examiner. This concentration simplifies the tracking of filings but limits the diversity of examiner perspectives within the portfolio. The Chemistry & Materials filings remain under the oversight of the assigned examiner as the prosecution continues.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, CAM N | 1 | 84.8% | +12.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19387935 | Process for Removing Salts from an Aluminium Dross | NGUYEN, CAM N | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19387935 | Process for Removing Salts from an Aluminium Dross | NGUYEN, CAM N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1736 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19387935 | Process for Removing Salts from an Aluminium Dross | NGUYEN, CAM N | 1736 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 13, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial