Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Fireaidbox OY currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly specific technical focus for the company's current active matters. The busiest examiner for the company is LEE, CHEE-CHONG, who holds 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending office action for the entire company, this examiner is responsible for all current active prosecution.
Practitioners should note that the 1 distinct examiner, LEE, CHEE-CHONG, is the sole point of contact for the company's 1 pending office action. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit within Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering suggests that the company's intellectual property is currently being evaluated by a single technical group. This centralized prosecution profile means that the outcome of the 1 pending office action will define the company's immediate success in this technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, CHEE-CHONG | 1 | 64.4% | +52.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18692079 | DEVICE FOR CONTRAINING A VEHICLE FIRE | LEE, CHEE-CHONG | 72d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18692079 | DEVICE FOR CONTRAINING A VEHICLE FIRE | LEE, CHEE-CHONG | 72d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3752 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18692079 | DEVICE FOR CONTRAINING A VEHICLE FIRE | LEE, CHEE-CHONG | 3752 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 72d | Pending | Mar 14, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial