Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Fisher & Paykel Appliances Limited

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Fisher & Paykel Appliances Limited manages 4 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These matters are distributed across 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units. This creates a direct alignment where each pending action is reviewed by a unique examiner in a unique art unit.

The busiest examiner, KENERLY, TERRANCE L, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Every examiner in this portfolio currently handles exactly 1 pending action. This distribution requires the company to navigate 4 different examiner perspectives across 4 separate art units simultaneously, as no single examiner oversees multiple files.

The involvement of 4 distinct art units suggests that the company's semiconductor and optics filings cover a variety of specialized sub-sectors. Practitioners must tailor their prosecution strategies to the specific standards of each of the 4 distinct examiners. The lack of overlap between examiners means that successes or setbacks in one matter may not directly influence the others.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§102 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
50% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KENERLY, TERRANCE L 1 73.8% +15.2%
MCDUFFIE, MICHAEL D 1 67.7% -10.5%
DINH, THAI T 1 85.9% +0.5%
WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 1 70.3% +18.8%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18227539 TRIM ATTACHMENT SYSTEM FOR APPLIANCE WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 70d
19099115 TOE-KICK PLATE ATTACHMENT SYSTEM FOR APPLIANCE MCDUFFIE, MICHAEL D —
18864967 NOISE CANCELLATION FOR DOMESTIC APPLIANCES DINH, THAI T —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18227539 TRIM ATTACHMENT SYSTEM FOR APPLIANCE WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 70d
19205133 ELECTRIC MOTOR KENERLY, TERRANCE L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2834 1
3632 1
2837 1
3637 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19205133 ELECTRIC MOTOR KENERLY, TERRANCE L 2834 §102Other Final Rejection — Pending May 12, 2025
19099115 TOE-KICK PLATE ATTACHMENT SYSTEM FOR APPLIANCE MCDUFFIE, MICHAEL D 3632 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 28, 2025
18864967 NOISE CANCELLATION FOR DOMESTIC APPLIANCES DINH, THAI T 2837 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18227539 TRIM ATTACHMENT SYSTEM FOR APPLIANCE WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 3637 §102§103 Non-Final OA 70d Pending Jul 28, 2023

Managing Fisher & Paykel Appliances Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Fisher & Paykel Appliances Limited have?

Fisher & Paykel Appliances Limited has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Fisher & Paykel Appliances Limited applications?

Terrance L Kenerly has the most, with 1 of Fisher & Paykel Appliances Limited's pending office actions.

What technology area are Fisher & Paykel Appliances Limited's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month