Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PALMARCHUK, BRIAN KEITH | 1 | 73.3% | +16.7% |
| AGUILERA, TODD | 1 | 57.1% | +57.1% |
| BOURZIK, BRAHIM | 1 | 65.3% | +44.5% |
| MCLEAN, NEIL R | 1 | 79.7% | +10.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18683009 | PERCEPTION TESTING | PALMARCHUK, BRIAN KEITH | 15d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18279773 | SIMULATION BASED TESTING FOR TRAJECTORY PLANNERS | BOURZIK, BRAHIM | 35d overdue |
| 18683009 | PERCEPTION TESTING | PALMARCHUK, BRIAN KEITH | 15d overdue |
| 18564300 | TOOLS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE PLANNERS | AGUILERA, TODD | 15d |
| 18272950 | EXTRACTING FEATURES FROM SENSOR DATA | MCLEAN, NEIL R | 22d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3669 | 1 |
| 2192 | 1 |
| 2191 | 1 |
| 2681 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18683009 | PERCEPTION TESTING | PALMARCHUK, BRIAN KEITH | 3669 | §101 | Final Rejection | 15d overdue | Pending | Feb 12, 2024 |
| 18564300 | TOOLS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE PLANNERS | AGUILERA, TODD | 2192 | §103 | Final Rejection | 15d | Pending | Nov 27, 2023 |
| 18279773 | SIMULATION BASED TESTING FOR TRAJECTORY PLANNERS | BOURZIK, BRAHIM | 2191 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 35d overdue | Pending | Aug 31, 2023 |
| 18272950 | EXTRACTING FEATURES FROM SENSOR DATA | MCLEAN, NEIL R | 2681 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 22d | Pending | Jul 18, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial