Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Flare Bright Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The prosecution effort involves OH, HARRY Y as the busiest examiner.
OH, HARRY Y is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending action. For a practitioner, the pending workload is consolidated under this examiner. This allows for a communication strategy with the examiner to resolve the outstanding issues in the 1 distinct art unit involved. The alignment of 1 pending office action with 1 distinct examiner indicates the current structure of the personnel involved. This organization relates to the tracking of deadlines and examiner preferences within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector for the company. The 1 pending office action represents the total active prosecution for the company at this time.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OH, HARRY Y | 1 | 85.2% | +17.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19244225 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR ATTITUDE DETERMINATION OF AN AIRCRAFT FOR NAVIGATION | OH, HARRY Y | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19244225 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR ATTITUDE DETERMINATION OF AN AIRCRAFT FOR NAVIGATION | OH, HARRY Y | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3657 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19244225 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR ATTITUDE DETERMINATION OF AN AIRCRAFT FOR NAVIGATION | OH, HARRY Y | 3657 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 20, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial