Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Florida Research Group LLC

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Florida Research Group LLC has 4 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are located in 3 distinct art units, indicating that the 4 pending office actions span several specialized technical areas. The portfolio involves distinct examiners, which means that every pending action is being reviewed by a different person. This distribution requires the company to manage different examiner perspectives simultaneously.

KASSA, TIGABU is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action. Since there are distinct examiners for 4 pending actions, each case is reviewed by a different person. The 3 distinct art units indicate that the pending office actions are being reviewed by different technical groups within the office. Practitioners should be prepared for different examiner styles while navigating the procedural requirements of the 3 distinct art units for the 4 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KASSA, TIGABU 1 36.7% +27.9%
PERREIRA, MELISSA JEAN 1 52.1% +25.7%
KERSHAW, KELLY P 1 17.7% +16.0%
MERCHLINSKY, JOSEPH CULLEN 1 5.9% -6.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18302171 IMPROVED METHODS OF MAKING NON-AQUEOUS CHEWS MERCHLINSKY, JOSEPH CULLEN 20d
18352393 EASILY SPOONABLE PROTEIN-RICH SUPPLEMENT PASTE KERSHAW, KELLY P —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18969629 Stable Soft Chews, and Methods to Produce Same PERREIRA, MELISSA JEAN 26d overdue
19018403 Soft Chews with Low Water Activity and Methods of Manufacturing Same KASSA, TIGABU 71d
18352393 EASILY SPOONABLE PROTEIN-RICH SUPPLEMENT PASTE KERSHAW, KELLY P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1791 2
1619 1
1618 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19018403 Soft Chews with Low Water Activity and Methods of Manufacturing Same KASSA, TIGABU 1619 §103 Final Rejection 71d Pending Jan 13, 2025
18969629 Stable Soft Chews, and Methods to Produce Same PERREIRA, MELISSA JEAN 1618 §103 Non-Final OA 26d overdue Pending Dec 05, 2024
18352393 EASILY SPOONABLE PROTEIN-RICH SUPPLEMENT PASTE KERSHAW, KELLY P 1791 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 14, 2023
18302171 IMPROVED METHODS OF MAKING NON-AQUEOUS CHEWS MERCHLINSKY, JOSEPH CULLEN 1791 §103 Non-Final OA 20d Pending Apr 18, 2023

Managing Florida Research Group LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Florida Research Group LLC have?

Florida Research Group LLC has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Florida Research Group LLC applications?

Tigabu Kassa has the most, with 1 of Florida Research Group LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Florida Research Group LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month