Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Fluid Technology Solutions (Fts) Inc. operates in the Chemistry & Materials technology area with 1 pending office action. This action is under review by 1 distinct examiner, PEO, JONATHAN M, within 1 distinct art unit. The 1 pending office action represents the company's current focus in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
PEO, JONATHAN M is the busiest examiner for the company, handling 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution is centralized. This 1 pending office action constitutes the total active workload for the company's intellectual property within the patent office.
For practitioners, the 1 distinct examiner manages the entire pending inventory, ensuring a uniform review process. The presence of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the company's current filings are targeted toward a specific technical niche within Chemistry & Materials. This 1 pending office action is the primary indicator of the company's progress at the patent office.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEO, JONATHAN M | 1 | 48.2% | +48.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18560199 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING MAGNESIUM, CALCIUM, AND/OR SULFATE FROM SODIUM CHLORIDE BRINE DURING CONCENTRATION BY HIGH-PRESSURE NANOFILTRATION | PEO, JONATHAN M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1779 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18560199 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING MAGNESIUM, CALCIUM, AND/OR SULFATE FROM SODIUM CHLORIDE BRINE DURING CONCENTRATION BY HIGH-PRESSURE NANOFILTRATION | PEO, JONATHAN M | 1779 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 10, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial