Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Flyhouse Technology LLC maintains a patent portfolio focused on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The current data shows 1 pending office action, which is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. This prosecution activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus for the company's current filings.
The examiner ZEROUAL, OMAR is listed as the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given that the total of 1 pending office action is the same as this examiner's workload, he is currently responsible for the entire active docket. This ratio between the busiest examiner pending and the total pending actions highlights a streamlined interaction with the patent office.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the legal strategy is currently localized within a specialized group. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the specific requirements of ZEROUAL, OMAR, as this individual manages the 1 busiest examiner pending action. This centralized workload simplifies the monitoring of deadlines and examiner-specific trends.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZEROUAL, OMAR | 1 | 33.5% | +39.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18658530 | System and Method for charting a plane | ZEROUAL, OMAR | 14d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18658530 | System and Method for charting a plane | ZEROUAL, OMAR | 14d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18658530 | System and Method for charting a plane | ZEROUAL, OMAR | 3628 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | May 08, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial