Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Communications

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia is managing 3 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These 3 actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This ratio between actions, examiners, and art units suggests a prosecution landscape with no overlap in personnel or administrative oversight. Practitioners should note that the 3 pending office actions are being reviewed by various examiners, which may lead to varied prosecution timelines and outcomes.

RUSH, ERIC is the busiest examiner, though they only hold 1 pending office action out of the 3 total. Because each of the 3 pending office actions is in a different art unit, the company must navigate three different sets of examiner expectations and unit-specific practices. This distribution across 3 distinct examiners means that no single examiner's tendencies will have a disproportionate impact on the overall portfolio. The involvement of 3 distinct art units requires a prosecution strategy that is sensitive to the specific internal cultures of each unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
33% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RUSH, ERIC 1 60.8% +36.2%
HANEY, AMANDA MARIE 1 36.5% +45.0%
WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL 1 58.0% +48.4%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18712268 INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM RUSH, ERIC —
18570201 MARKER FOR DNA DAMAGE IN PROXIMITY OF TRANSCRIBED GENOMIC LOCI AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING AND/OR QUANTIFYING THESE DNA DAMAGES HANEY, AMANDA MARIE —
18264074 METHODS FOR CANCER DETECTION WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18712268 INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM RUSH, ERIC —
18570201 MARKER FOR DNA DAMAGE IN PROXIMITY OF TRANSCRIBED GENOMIC LOCI AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING AND/OR QUANTIFYING THESE DNA DAMAGES HANEY, AMANDA MARIE —
18264074 METHODS FOR CANCER DETECTION WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2677 1
1682 1
1758 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18712268 INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM RUSH, ERIC 2677 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 02, 2024
18570201 MARKER FOR DNA DAMAGE IN PROXIMITY OF TRANSCRIBED GENOMIC LOCI AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING AND/OR QUANTIFYING THESE DNA DAMAGES HANEY, AMANDA MARIE 1682 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 14, 2023
18264074 METHODS FOR CANCER DETECTION WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL 1758 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 02, 2023

Managing Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia have?

Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia applications?

Eric Rush has the most, with 1 of Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia's pending office actions.

What technology area are Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia's patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month