Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Forebond Advanced Material Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Forebond Advanced Material Co. Ltd. is managing 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner and a distinct art unit, showing a centralized approach to its current intellectual property filings. This concentration means that the company's current legal strategy is focused on a specific chemical or material science domain. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the internal guidelines of the assigned group to advance the pending office action.

The busiest examiner is WOLLSCHLAGER, JEFFREY MICHAEL, who is responsible for the pending office action. Since there is only a single examiner, the entire pending portfolio is subject to the specific examination practices of this individual. WOLLSCHLAGER, JEFFREY MICHAEL manages the matter, and his past decisions will likely influence the current prosecution. The presence of only a single examiner and art unit indicates that there is no diversification of examiner perspectives. Successful navigation of the pending office action will depend on a targeted response to the examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WOLLSCHLAGER, JEFFREY MICHAEL 1 62.1% +29.6%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18732853 PREPARATION METHOD FOR MICROPOROUS FILM WOLLSCHLAGER, JEFFREY MICHAEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1742 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18732853 PREPARATION METHOD FOR MICROPOROUS FILM WOLLSCHLAGER, JEFFREY MICHAEL 1742 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 04, 2024

Managing Forebond Advanced Material Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month