Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Fortune Industrial (Vietnam) Joint Stock Company currently manages a focused patent portfolio within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company has 1 pending office action. This concentration indicates a prosecution phase where all current activity is localized to the distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is DEERY, ERIN LEAH. This examiner is responsible for the pending office action, representing the entirety of the company's current pending workload. The reliance on the distinct art unit suggests that its current innovation is tightly clustered within the mechanical engineering field. Resolving this action is the primary hurdle for the current portfolio. Practitioners can benefit from this structure by developing an understanding of the examiner's specific technical expectations and procedural preferences. This approach minimizes the need for varied strategies across different art units and allows for a more efficient path toward allowance. The pending office action represents the primary focus of the company's current efforts to expand its intellectual property in this sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEERY, ERIN LEAH | 1 | 58.3% | +49.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19026081 | WATER OUTLET STRUCTURE AND SINK | DEERY, ERIN LEAH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19026081 | WATER OUTLET STRUCTURE AND SINK | DEERY, ERIN LEAH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3754 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19026081 | WATER OUTLET STRUCTURE AND SINK | DEERY, ERIN LEAH | 3754 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 16, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial