Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Fukui Prefectural Government has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This case is assigned to a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit, showing a concentrated prosecution focus. The organization's current activity is entirely contained within this specific technical and administrative channel at the patent office.
The busiest examiner, KUMAR, PREETI, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the total pending office actions for the organization is 1, this examiner handles all current prosecution matters. The involvement of a distinct art unit indicates that the organization's chemistry-related innovations are being reviewed by a specific group of experts. This allows for a targeted approach to addressing the examiner's requirements and navigating the procedural environment of the art unit involved. Practitioners can tailor their responses to the specific technical expectations of this examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUMAR, PREETI | 1 | 31.9% | +43.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19115914 | FIBER PRODUCT WITH ADHESIVE, ADHESIVE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FIBER PRODUCT WITH ADHESIVE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FIBER PRODUCT | KUMAR, PREETI | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19115914 | FIBER PRODUCT WITH ADHESIVE, ADHESIVE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FIBER PRODUCT WITH ADHESIVE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FIBER PRODUCT | KUMAR, PREETI | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1761 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19115914 | FIBER PRODUCT WITH ADHESIVE, ADHESIVE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FIBER PRODUCT WITH ADHESIVE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FIBER PRODUCT | KUMAR, PREETI | 1761 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 27, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial