Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Full Sun LLC is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently has 1 pending office action. This matter is being processed by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This singular focus indicates that the company's current prosecution efforts are concentrated on a specific technological advancement. For practitioners, this means that the immediate success of the portfolio is tied to the resolution of this 1 pending office action.
STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action under review. This single action accounts for all of the company's current pending office action activity, concentrating the prosecution focus on 1 specific examiner. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company can develop a highly targeted strategy for its response. This streamlined prosecution profile reduces the administrative burden of managing multiple deadlines and allows for a deep focus on the requirements of Examiner STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN | 1 | 39.2% | +35.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18415318 | TOY CONSTRUCTION KITS AND RELATED METHODS | STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18415318 | TOY CONSTRUCTION KITS AND RELATED METHODS | STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3711 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18415318 | TOY CONSTRUCTION KITS AND RELATED METHODS | STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN | 3711 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Jan 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial