Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Futurecite Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Futurecite Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This prosecution activity is confined to a distinct art unit and a distinct examiner, representing a singular point of contact at the USPTO. The company's current strategy is therefore highly dependent on the specific examination environment and procedural expectations of this particular art unit.

The busiest examiner, SHORTER, RASHIDA R, is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending action. For this portfolio, the entirety of the pending workload is subject to the discretion of this examiner, making their specific examination style the primary factor in current prosecution success. With only a single examiner involved, the company does not currently face the challenge of coordinating multiple responses across different examiners or art units. The outcome of the 1 pending office action will determine the immediate growth of the company's Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHORTER, RASHIDA R 1 18.1% +26.2%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18842330 FACILITATING PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDIVIDUAL SHORTER, RASHIDA R —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18842330 FACILITATING PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDIVIDUAL SHORTER, RASHIDA R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3626 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18842330 FACILITATING PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDIVIDUAL SHORTER, RASHIDA R 3626 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 28, 2024

Managing Futurecite Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month