Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
G-Tekt Corporation manages a patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio currently has 2 pending office actions. These actions are spread across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a range of technical review and examination styles. The involvement of 2 distinct art units requires the applicant to navigate multiple simultaneous patent office interactions across different sectors.
ORTIZ, ARYANA YASMINE is identified as the busiest examiner for G-Tekt Corporation, handling 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is part of the 2 pending office actions currently active for the portfolio. Because the portfolio involves 2 distinct examiners, the prosecution strategy must account for different examiner behaviors. The distribution of 1 pending office action to the busiest examiner shows that ORTIZ, ARYANA YASMINE does not handle the entire pending workload for the company.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORTIZ, ARYANA YASMINE | 1 | 50.0% | +29.2% |
| ROE, JESSEE RANDALL | 1 | 76.4% | +7.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18556009 | BATTERY CASE STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF BATTERY CASE STRUCTURE | ORTIZ, ARYANA YASMINE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18556009 | BATTERY CASE STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF BATTERY CASE STRUCTURE | ORTIZ, ARYANA YASMINE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1751 | 1 |
| 1759 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18556009 | BATTERY CASE STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF BATTERY CASE STRUCTURE | ORTIZ, ARYANA YASMINE | 1751 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 18, 2023 |
| 18552719 | FORMING METHOD, HEAT TREATMENT SYSTEM, AND FORMED PRODUCT | ROE, JESSEE RANDALL | 1759 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial