Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
G9 Holdings LLC operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with a focused prosecution strategy. The company currently has 1 pending office action, which is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. This concentration suggests that the company's active intellectual property efforts are currently limited to a specific technical inquiry or a single patent application. By working within 1 distinct art unit, the company navigates a single set of examination guidelines rather than managing the varied requirements of multiple units. This structure simplifies the administrative burden of tracking diverse prosecution timelines.
The busiest examiner for G9 Holdings LLC is WEBER, JONATHAN C, who is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because this examiner handles the only active matter in the portfolio, the company's immediate success at the USPTO depends on this individual's review. For a practitioner, this means that understanding the specific patterns and preferences of WEBER, JONATHAN C is essential for the current portfolio. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit indicates a streamlined but highly centralized approach to patent acquisition. This allows for a very specific and targeted response to the pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEBER, JONATHAN C | 1 | 64.6% | +28.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18503788 | Projectile with Enhanced Ballistics | WEBER, JONATHAN C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18503788 | Projectile with Enhanced Ballistics | WEBER, JONATHAN C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3641 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18503788 | Projectile with Enhanced Ballistics | WEBER, JONATHAN C | 3641 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial