1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Galiant Arts LLC currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which limits the current scope of the company's engagement with the patent office. The data shows 0 distinct art units, suggesting that the pending case may be in a specialized category or an early stage of the review process. This absence of art unit data indicates that the prosecution is not currently distributed across different technical departments.
THOMAS, ERIC M is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because THOMAS, ERIC M is the only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate prosecution success rests entirely on this individual's review. This consolidated profile indicates a very specific or limited focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts. With only 1 pending office action active, the company faces a binary outcome for its portfolio, as there are 0 distinct art units or other pending matters to balance the results of this single examination by THOMAS, ERIC M.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| THOMAS, ERIC M | 1 | 69.9% | +14.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19085037 | FACILITATING GENERATION OF PLAYER TOKEN NFTS BASED ON GAME CHARACTER ATTRIBUTES AND METHODS FOR USE THEREWITH | THOMAS, ERIC M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19085037 | FACILITATING GENERATION OF PLAYER TOKEN NFTS BASED ON GAME CHARACTER ATTRIBUTES AND METHODS FOR USE THEREWITH | THOMAS, ERIC M | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19085037 | FACILITATING GENERATION OF PLAYER TOKEN NFTS BASED ON GAME CHARACTER ATTRIBUTES AND METHODS FOR USE THEREWITH | THOMAS, ERIC M | — | §101DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 20, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial