Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Game Raiser Pty Ltd. currently maintains 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This specific volume of pending actions suggests a focused prosecution phase for the company. The portfolio is currently being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, which limits the breadth of examiner interactions for the applicant. Furthermore, the work is contained within 1 distinct art unit, centralizing the technical review process within a specialized group at the patent office.
The busiest examiner identified in the data is PARSLEY, DAVID J, who is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This individual is responsible for the total volume of pending office actions for the company. Such a concentration means that the outcome of the company's current prosecution efforts depends on the findings of this examiner. For practitioners, this indicates that understanding the specific preferences and history of PARSLEY, DAVID J is paramount, as there are no other examiners or art units currently involved to provide a broader perspective.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PARSLEY, DAVID J | 1 | 54.0% | +28.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17864159 | Teaser | PARSLEY, DAVID J | 4d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3643 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17864159 | Teaser | PARSLEY, DAVID J | 3643 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Jul 13, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial