Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Gardyn Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Gardyn Inc. maintains a portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. There are 2 pending office actions currently active for the company. These actions are split between 2 distinct art units, which suggests that the company's innovations span different technical classifications. This distribution requires a strategy that accounts for the different examination practices found in these 2 units.

The company's prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners. ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action under her review. While she is the busiest, her 1 action is only a portion of the 2 total pending office actions. The other action is handled by the second distinct examiner, which suggests that no single individual's viewpoint will entirely dictate the portfolio's progress.

The 2 distinct art units provide a diverse landscape for the 2 pending office actions. Practitioners must manage the expectations of 2 distinct examiners, each potentially applying different nuances to the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems subject matter. ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS's 1 pending office action represents the highest individual workload in this small portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS 1 30.3% +56.9%
KLOECKER, KATHERINE ANNE 1 44.3% +37.5%
CALLAWAY, SPENCER THOMAS 1 36.7% +16.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19038471 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PLANT CULTIVATION ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS 26d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18582472 PLANT GROWTH CONTAINER CALLAWAY, SPENCER THOMAS 9d
19038471 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PLANT CULTIVATION ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS 26d
18745587 PRESERVATION MODE FOR PLANT-GROWING SYSTEM KLOECKER, KATHERINE ANNE 27d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3642 2
3643 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19038471 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PLANT CULTIVATION ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS 3643 §103§112 Non-Final OA 26d Pending Jan 27, 2025
18745587 PRESERVATION MODE FOR PLANT-GROWING SYSTEM KLOECKER, KATHERINE ANNE 3642 §103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Jun 17, 2024
18582472 PLANT GROWTH CONTAINER CALLAWAY, SPENCER THOMAS 3642 §103 Final Rejection 9d Pending Feb 20, 2024

Managing Gardyn Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month