Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 23 patents granted in the last 365 days
Garuda Technology Co. Ltd. maintains a company patent portfolio focused on the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The data shows 2 pending office actions currently active. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution signifies that each pending matter is being handled by a unique examiner in a unique art unit.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is DUNLAP, JONATHAN M. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the total count of pending actions is 2, DUNLAP, JONATHAN M manages 1 of the company's active prosecution matters. The remaining pending action is handled by another distinct examiner.
The involvement of 2 distinct art units indicates that the pending technology is classified within different technical groups. Practitioners must account for the standards of 2 different art units and the specific tendencies of 2 different examiners. This structure for the 2 pending office actions requires a broader approach to prosecution within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector, as each matter is subject to independent review.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUNLAP, JONATHAN M | 1 | 76.1% | +16.6% |
| FREAL, JOHN BRENDAN | 1 | 93.2% | +8.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18383711 | SENSING MODULE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | DUNLAP, JONATHAN M | — |
| 18457784 | CIRCUIT BOARD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | FREAL, JOHN BRENDAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18383711 | SENSING MODULE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | DUNLAP, JONATHAN M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2855 | 1 |
| 3729 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18383711 | SENSING MODULE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | DUNLAP, JONATHAN M | 2855 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 25, 2023 |
| 18457784 | CIRCUIT BOARD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | FREAL, JOHN BRENDAN | 3729 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 29, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialGaruda Technology Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Jonathan M Dunlap has the most, with 1 of Garuda Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
