Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Gastroklenz Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This portfolio is highly concentrated, as the 2 pending actions are assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This centralization suggests a narrow focus for the company's current prosecution efforts and a reliance on a single point of contact within the patent office. For a practitioner, this means that the entire active portfolio is subject to the specific examination style and precedents of this specific group.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is MARJAN FARDANESH, who is responsible for 2 pending office actions. Because this examiner handles the entirety of the company's active workload, the prosecution strategy for Gastroklenz Inc. is currently dependent on the specific practices and requirements of this individual. This creates a situation where the company's success in the medical device sector is tied to a single relationship. Practitioners should focus on the specific history and allowance rates of this examiner to predict future outcomes for the current workload.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FARDANESH, MARJAN | 2 | 72.6% | +19.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18405552 | SENSOR MONITORING SYSTEM FOR IN-DWELLING CATHETER BASED TREATMENTS | FARDANESH, MARJAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18651126 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR FLUID MONITORING | FARDANESH, MARJAN | — |
| 18405552 | SENSOR MONITORING SYSTEM FOR IN-DWELLING CATHETER BASED TREATMENTS | FARDANESH, MARJAN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18651126 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR FLUID MONITORING | FARDANESH, MARJAN | 3791 | §102DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 30, 2024 |
| 18405552 | SENSOR MONITORING SYSTEM FOR IN-DWELLING CATHETER BASED TREATMENTS | FARDANESH, MARJAN | 3791 | §102§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialGastroklenz Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Marjan Fardanesh has the most, with 2 of Gastroklenz Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
