Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Gecco Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio involves a distinct examiner, LUSK, AUDREY L, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. Prosecution is localized in a distinct art unit. This single pending action represents the entirety of the company's current prosecution activity. Practitioners should focus on the specific examiner's approach to mechanical systems to advance this matter.
The presence of a pending office action indicates a streamlined prosecution environment. Because the portfolio is limited to a single distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit, there is no internal baseline for comparing examiner behavior or art unit efficiency within the company's own data. Success for Gecco Inc. depends on navigating the specific requirements of LUSK, AUDREY L. This concentration under a single point of review simplifies administrative tracking but increases the impact of any single procedural hurdle.
In the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field, where examination can be highly technical, having a distinct art unit involved suggests a consistent application of subject matter standards. However, the reliance on a distinct examiner means that the company's patent trajectory is currently subject to a single perspective. Practitioners should focus on the historical allowance rates and common rejection types associated with the specific examiner to optimize their response strategy for the 1 pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUSK, AUDREY L | 1 | 68.9% | +23.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18369840 | THREE-POINT HITCH ADAPTERS, ATTACHMENTS, BALE WRAP ROLLING ASSEMBLIES, AND RELATED METHODS OF USE | LUSK, AUDREY L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18369840 | THREE-POINT HITCH ADAPTERS, ATTACHMENTS, BALE WRAP ROLLING ASSEMBLIES, AND RELATED METHODS OF USE | LUSK, AUDREY L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3671 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18369840 | THREE-POINT HITCH ADAPTERS, ATTACHMENTS, BALE WRAP ROLLING ASSEMBLIES, AND RELATED METHODS OF USE | LUSK, AUDREY L | 3671 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialGecco Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Audrey L Lusk has the most, with 1 of Gecco Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
