Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Geeder Company Limited currently manages 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner across 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated prosecution footprint at this stage. For a practitioner, this means the entire current trajectory of the company's patent filings is subject to the administrative standards of a specialized unit within the patent office. This concentration allows for a specific focus on the technical requirements of that unit.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This individual handles the company's current pending workload, suggesting that the outcome of this specific interaction will define the portfolio's immediate progress in the Chemistry & Materials sector. Because there are no other active examiners, the company's prosecution strategy does not currently need to account for divergent examiner behaviors or varying art unit requirements.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES | 1 | 47.6% | +49.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18383914 | MANUFACTURING METHOD OF LIGHT-TRIGGERED LIGHT-TRANSMITTING CLEANING STRUCTURE AND CLEANING METHOD USING LIGHT-TRIGGERED LIGHT-TRANSMITTING CLEANING STRUCTURE | PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES | 41d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18383914 | MANUFACTURING METHOD OF LIGHT-TRIGGERED LIGHT-TRANSMITTING CLEANING STRUCTURE AND CLEANING METHOD USING LIGHT-TRIGGERED LIGHT-TRANSMITTING CLEANING STRUCTURE | PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES | 41d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1799 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18383914 | MANUFACTURING METHOD OF LIGHT-TRIGGERED LIGHT-TRANSMITTING CLEANING STRUCTURE AND CLEANING METHOD USING LIGHT-TRIGGERED LIGHT-TRANSMITTING CLEANING STRUCTURE | PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES | 1799 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 41d | Pending | Oct 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial