Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Geir Kroken has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, TRIVISONNO, ANGELO, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. The prosecution is limited to 1 distinct art unit.
This data reflects a highly focused and singular prosecution effort. Because of the current workload, the entire portfolio's progress at the USPTO is tied to the decisions of TRIVISONNO, ANGELO. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit suggests that the subject matter is concentrated within a specific chemical or material science classification.
For practitioners, the strategy is straightforward as it involves a single point of contact at the office. There are no other examiners or art units to compare against, making the interactions with the assigned examiner the sole focus of current prosecution efforts. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the active workload for this portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRIVISONNO, ANGELO | 1 | 53.0% | +25.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19138158 | Floating Solar Energy Production Device | TRIVISONNO, ANGELO | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1722 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19138158 | Floating Solar Energy Production Device | TRIVISONNO, ANGELO | 1722 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 12, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial