Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Gemini Group Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner within a single distinct art unit, indicating a singular focus for their current filings. This narrow distribution suggests that the company is currently focusing its intellectual property efforts on a specific material or chemical-related invention.
The busiest examiner, KIM, YUNJU, is responsible for the pending action. Because there is only the 1 pending office action in the portfolio, the company's current prosecution success depends on navigating the specific requirements of this examiner and art unit. Practitioners should focus on the history and preferences of the assigned examiner, as there are no other pending office actions to provide a broader view of the company's prospects in the Chemistry & Materials sector. The outcome of this single matter will be the sole determinant of the company's near-term progress in securing new patent rights for its 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM, YUNJU | 1 | 55.2% | +35.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18427334 | METHOD OF MAKING COMPRESSION MOLDED PARTS WITH BACK INJECTION MOLDED FEATURES | KIM, YUNJU | 5d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1742 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18427334 | METHOD OF MAKING COMPRESSION MOLDED PARTS WITH BACK INJECTION MOLDED FEATURES | KIM, YUNJU | 1742 | §103 | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | Jan 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial