Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Gen Digital Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 27 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Gen Digital Inc. currently has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, ensuring that each case is evaluated independently by a different official with their own perspective on the claims. The portfolio involves 3 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's medical and mechanical innovations are technically diverse and span multiple specialized classifications within the patent office.

Bruk A Gebremichael is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending action currently assigned to him. With 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, the company must manage multiple prosecution tracks simultaneously, each with its own set of examiner preferences and technical requirements. The involvement of 3 art units indicates that the subject matter spans different technical classifications, requiring a flexible approach to patent office interactions that can adapt to the varying standards of each unit.

The distribution of 3 pending actions among 3 distinct examiners reduces the risk of the entire portfolio being affected by a single official's decision. However, the presence of 3 distinct art units means that practitioners must be prepared for different technical prior art to be cited against the company's Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering innovations. Successfully navigating this portfolio requires a coordinated effort to address the specific feedback from Bruk A Gebremichael and the other examiners while maintaining a cohesive overall strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (67%)
§103 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A 1 22.1% +23.4%
DEWAN, KAMAL K 1 48.7% +38.1%
CAMPEN, KELLY SCAGGS 1 50.8% +31.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17660750 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING WEBSITES THAT PERPETRATE AT LEAST ONE OF SCAMS OR FRAUDS CAMPEN, KELLY SCAGGS 28d
19064375 GenAI Driven Personalized Education Platform GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17660750 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING WEBSITES THAT PERPETRATE AT LEAST ONE OF SCAMS OR FRAUDS CAMPEN, KELLY SCAGGS 28d
19064375 GenAI Driven Personalized Education Platform GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A —
18406838 AUTOMATED FACT-CHECKING INTEGRATED IN A WEB BROWSER DEWAN, KAMAL K —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3715 1
2163 1
3691 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19064375 GenAI Driven Personalized Education Platform GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A 3715 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 26, 2025
18406838 AUTOMATED FACT-CHECKING INTEGRATED IN A WEB BROWSER DEWAN, KAMAL K 2163 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 08, 2024
17660750 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING WEBSITES THAT PERPETRATE AT LEAST ONE OF SCAMS OR FRAUDS CAMPEN, KELLY SCAGGS 3691 §101§103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Apr 26, 2022

Managing Gen Digital Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month