Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Genegeniedx Corp. manages a company patent portfolio that currently features 1 pending office action. This 1 action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because the busiest examiner pending count matches the total pending office actions at 1, there is no distribution of labor across different personnel.
The prosecution is currently handled by 1 distinct examiner, reflecting the technical scope for the pending filing. Practitioners should note that HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD has oversight of the pending workload, meaning the outcome of this 1 action will dictate the immediate success rate for the portfolio. This concentration allows for a focus on the specific requirements and examination style of this individual. The presence of 1 pending office action represents the current scale of engagement with the patent office. Practitioners can tailor their approach specifically to HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD without needing to coordinate across multiple examiner preferences. The data shows 0 distinct art units, which may indicate an unusual classification status for the pending matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD | 1 | 36.4% | +20.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18172322 | METHODS FOR DETECTING HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION DEFICIENCY IN CANCER PATIENTS | HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18172322 | METHODS FOR DETECTING HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION DEFICIENCY IN CANCER PATIENTS | HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18172322 | METHODS FOR DETECTING HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION DEFICIENCY IN CANCER PATIENTS | HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD | — | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 22, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial