Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

General Dynamics Mission Systems Inc.

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

General Dynamics Mission Systems Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, ensuring that each case receives an independent review. The prosecution is also divided across 2 distinct art units, which suggests that the company's Communications innovations touch upon different technical specialties.

VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N is identified as the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 of the pending actions. With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is spread across the available examiners. This structure, involving 2 distinct art units, means the company must tailor its prosecution strategy to different technical environments within the Communications sector.

The presence of 2 distinct examiners for the pending actions indicates a lack of concentration in the examination process. For a practitioner, this distribution requires managing separate paths to patent allowance while maintaining consistency in the company's technical disclosures. The involvement of 2 distinct art units highlights the multifaceted nature of the company's current intellectual property filings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N 1 23.9% +0.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18953909 FREE SPACE OPTICS COHERENT RECEIVER ARCHITECTURE USING OPTICAL INJECTION LOCKING VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2634 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18953909 FREE SPACE OPTICS COHERENT RECEIVER ARCHITECTURE USING OPTICAL INJECTION LOCKING VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N 2634 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 20, 2024

Managing General Dynamics Mission Systems Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month