Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Generale Biscuit

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Generale Biscuit currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners, providing different perspectives on the company's patent applications. Kelly P Kershaw is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing 1 pending office action. The prosecution is further localized within 1 distinct art unit.

For a practitioner, the distribution of actions across different examiners suggests that the portfolio is not dependent on a single individual's interpretation. The focus on the Chemistry & Materials technology area indicates a specialized technical direction. Because a distinct art unit is involved, the company may encounter consistent examination standards, which requires a coordinated prosecution approach.

Managing the distinct examiners requires a proactive approach to ensure that responses are aligned with the overall strategic goals of the company. Practitioners should analyze the allowance rates and prosecution timelines for each assigned examiner to better predict the outcomes for these pending matters. This approach helps in navigating the complexities of the materials patent landscape where examiner discretion can be significant. Maintaining a unified legal position across different examiners is essential for a strong intellectual property portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KERSHAW, KELLY P 1 17.7% +16.0%
LI, CHANGQING 1 29.2% +33.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
15747406 NON-BLOOM COMESTIBLE PRODUCT LI, CHANGQING 45d overdue
18411762 BREAKFAST BISCUIT WITH SLOWLY AVAILABLE GLUCOSE KERSHAW, KELLY P —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
15747406 NON-BLOOM COMESTIBLE PRODUCT LI, CHANGQING 45d overdue
18411762 BREAKFAST BISCUIT WITH SLOWLY AVAILABLE GLUCOSE KERSHAW, KELLY P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1791 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18411762 BREAKFAST BISCUIT WITH SLOWLY AVAILABLE GLUCOSE KERSHAW, KELLY P 1791 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 12, 2024
15747406 NON-BLOOM COMESTIBLE PRODUCT LI, CHANGQING 1791 §103 Non-Final OA 45d overdue Pending Jan 24, 2018

Managing Generale Biscuit's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Generale Biscuit have?

Generale Biscuit has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Generale Biscuit applications?

Kelly P Kershaw has the most, with 1 of Generale Biscuit's pending office actions.

What technology area are Generale Biscuit's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month