Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Genesis Pergolas LLC currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to examiner KRYCINSKI, STANTON L, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. Because the entire active portfolio consists of this 1 pending office action, the company's immediate patent strategy is highly concentrated on this specific interaction. The prosecution is limited to a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit, which suggests a narrow technical focus for the company's current filings.
Practitioners should note that with only a distinct examiner involved, there is no opportunity to compare examiner behaviors or art unit trends within the company's own data. The reliance on a distinct art unit means that the prosecution outcome will be determined by the specific standards and precedents of that technical group. For a portfolio of this size, the relationship with KRYCINSKI, STANTON L is the primary factor in determining the timeline and success of the company's current intellectual property efforts. This lack of diversification across examiners or art units means that any procedural delays or technical hurdles encountered in the pending office action will affect the company's entire pending pipeline.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KRYCINSKI, STANTON L | 1 | 68.4% | +28.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18897815 | Photovoltaic Shade Structures and Related Methods and Assemblies | KRYCINSKI, STANTON L | 26d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18897815 | Photovoltaic Shade Structures and Related Methods and Assemblies | KRYCINSKI, STANTON L | 26d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3631 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18897815 | Photovoltaic Shade Structures and Related Methods and Assemblies | KRYCINSKI, STANTON L | 3631 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | Sep 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial