1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Genicity Limited currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. There are 0 distinct art units reported for this portfolio, suggesting the pending action is currently outside a standard art unit classification in the provided data. This can occur during certain administrative transitions within the patent office.
ELIZABETH A SHUPE is the busiest examiner, handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This single action constitutes the total volume of 1 pending office action for the company. Prosecution is currently centralized under this one examiner, which simplifies the communication strategy for the applicant as they only need to address the concerns of a single individual at this stage.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHUPE, ELIZABETH A | 1 | 66.2% | +44.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18294693 | ENGINEERED TCR COMPLEX AND METHODS OF USING GAME | SHUPE, ELIZABETH A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18294693 | ENGINEERED TCR COMPLEX AND METHODS OF USING GAME | SHUPE, ELIZABETH A | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18294693 | ENGINEERED TCR COMPLEX AND METHODS OF USING GAME | SHUPE, ELIZABETH A | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial