Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Geolith is currently prosecuting 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This activity is confined to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests a highly specialized technical focus for the company's current patent filings. DIAZ, MATTHEW R is the busiest examiner for Geolith, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action.
Because there is only 1 distinct examiner, the company's immediate prosecution success relies on navigating the specific requirements of this examiner. The presence of 1 distinct art unit further confirms the narrow technical scope of the active portfolio. For practitioners, the 1 pending office action represents the critical path for the company's Chemistry & Materials intellectual property. Engaging effectively with DIAZ, MATTHEW R is essential, as this 1 examiner controls the entirety of the current pending workload. This streamlined prosecution structure allows for a very targeted approach to securing patent rights for Geolith's innovations.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| No statute on record | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIAZ, MATTHEW R | 1 | 54.0% | +43.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18032814 | COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND PROCESS FOR EXTRACTING LITHIUM USING THE SAME | DIAZ, MATTHEW R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1761 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18032814 | COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND PROCESS FOR EXTRACTING LITHIUM USING THE SAME | DIAZ, MATTHEW R | 1761 | — | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial