Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Gerard Martin Poubel currently manages 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, RASHID, ANNA SALEM, who is the busiest examiner. The portfolio's activity is limited to 1 distinct art unit.
The 1 pending office action represents the total current prosecution workload for this portfolio. RASHID, ANNA SALEM is the sole examiner and handles the 1 busiest examiner pending action, making their individual examination style the central focus for the practitioner. There is no diversity in examiners or art units to mitigate the impact of this single examiner's decisions.
Operating within 1 distinct art unit allows the legal team to focus on a specific set of technical and legal standards. However, the reliance on 1 distinct examiner means that the immediate success depends entirely on the outcome of this one case. Practitioners must carefully tailor their arguments to the preferences of RASHID, ANNA SALEM to move the 1 pending office action toward allowance.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RASHID, ANNA SALEM | 1 | 57.1% | +16.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17923380 | WEARABLE DECORATIVE ELEMENT | RASHID, ANNA SALEM | 67d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3677 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17923380 | WEARABLE DECORATIVE ELEMENT | RASHID, ANNA SALEM | 3677 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 67d overdue | Pending | Nov 04, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial