Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Gerhard Schubert GmbH

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Gerhard Schubert GmbH currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner, SEIF, DARIUSH, who is also the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending action. The prosecution is occurring within a single art unit.

The presence of the pending office action in the art unit suggests a targeted approach for the current patent applications. By interacting with SEIF, DARIUSH, the company can develop a clear understanding of the technical requirements in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. This concentration minimizes the complexity often found in portfolios that are spread across multiple examiners.

For the practitioner, the 1 pending office action represents a primary area of attention for the company's intellectual property efforts. The involvement of the sole examiner for the matter allows for a direct and efficient communication channel. This structure is ideal for ensuring that the specific technical nuances of the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering application are clearly addressed.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SEIF, DARIUSH 1 70.5% +6.2%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3731 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18644862 CUTTING SUPPLY UNIT AND METHOD FOR ITS OPERATION SEIF, DARIUSH 3731 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 24, 2024

Managing Gerhard Schubert GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month