Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Gestalt Tech Corp. is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. This prosecution activity is concentrated in 1 distinct art units, reflecting a specific technical focus for the company's current filings. The case is assigned to 1 distinct examiners, with SAMARA, HUSAM TURKI designated as the busiest examiner for the portfolio.
SAMARA, HUSAM TURKI is responsible for 1 pending office action, which represents the total volume of pending matters for Gestalt Tech Corp. at this time. Because there is only 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiners involved, the company's patent strategy is currently tied to the review of a single individual. This centralized prosecution in 1 distinct art units means that the company's success in the Computing & Software space currently depends on navigating the requirements of this specific examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAMARA, HUSAM TURKI | 1 | 55.7% | +17.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19197571 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA STRUCTURE ANALYSIS | SAMARA, HUSAM TURKI | 36d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2161 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19197571 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA STRUCTURE ANALYSIS | SAMARA, HUSAM TURKI | 2161 | §103 | Final Rejection | 36d overdue | Pending | May 02, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial