Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Gestion Soprema Canada Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This case is assigned to a distinct examiner, YACOB, SISAY, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The application is being processed within a distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical classification for the filing. This concentration in both examiner and art unit simplifies the current prosecution tracking for the company.
The pending office action is currently under the review of YACOB, SISAY, who holds 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because the portfolio is active in only a distinct art unit, the prosecution is highly localized within the Communications division. This concentration means the company's current patent efforts are focused on a technical review path and an examiner's discretion. This focus allows for direct management of the company's intellectual property interests.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| YACOB, SISAY | 1 | 76.9% | +17.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18951774 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD OF ALERTING A PROPERTY MANAGER OF A ROOF POOLING ISSUE | YACOB, SISAY | 42d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2686 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18951774 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD OF ALERTING A PROPERTY MANAGER OF A ROOF POOLING ISSUE | YACOB, SISAY | 2686 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 42d | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial