Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Gf Machining Solutions AG

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Gf Machining Solutions AG manages 2 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are distributed between 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. SHABMAN, MARK A is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. The distribution of 2 pending office actions across 2 distinct examiners suggests that each matter is being reviewed by a different individual in a different technical group.

The involvement of 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's innovations span different technical sub-fields. This variety requires a prosecution strategy that can adapt to different art unit norms and examiner styles. With 2 distinct examiners involved, the company can observe a range of examiner behaviors, even though MARK A SHABMAN is the only one identified as the busiest with 1 pending office action. This decentralized approach reduces the impact of any single examiner's perspective on the overall portfolio.

Practitioners should note that the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area often requires navigating specific electronic standards. Having 2 pending office actions across 2 distinct art units provides a broader view of how the USPTO perceives the company's technical disclosures. While the portfolio is currently managed by 2 distinct examiners, the coordination of these matters is essential to maintain consistency. The current data reflects an active engagement across multiple technical groups within the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
50% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHABMAN, MARK A 1 84.0% +13.1%
COOK, KYLE A 1 62.0% +39.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18767152 METHOD FOR CALIBRATING A DRESSING SPINDLE OF A MACHINE TOOL SHABMAN, MARK A —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18740142 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A STAMPING TOOL HAVING A STRUCTURE COOK, KYLE A —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18767152 METHOD FOR CALIBRATING A DRESSING SPINDLE OF A MACHINE TOOL SHABMAN, MARK A —
18740142 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A STAMPING TOOL HAVING A STRUCTURE COOK, KYLE A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2855 1
3726 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18767152 METHOD FOR CALIBRATING A DRESSING SPINDLE OF A MACHINE TOOL SHABMAN, MARK A 2855 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 09, 2024
18740142 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A STAMPING TOOL HAVING A STRUCTURE COOK, KYLE A 3726 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 11, 2024

Managing Gf Machining Solutions AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Gf Machining Solutions AG have?

Gf Machining Solutions AG has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Gf Machining Solutions AG applications?

Mark A Shabman has the most, with 1 of Gf Machining Solutions AG's pending office actions.

What technology area are Gf Machining Solutions AG's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month