Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Girish Krishnamurthy is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner, PORTER, RACHEL L, who is the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. The portfolio's activity is restricted to a distinct art unit.
With only a pending office action and a distinct examiner, the prosecution effort is highly concentrated. The focus on the distinct art unit within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area indicates a specific technical niche. Practitioners should prioritize the specific examination style of PORTER, RACHEL L to address the action effectively. The absence of other pending matters means that the pending office action represents the entirety of the current prosecution risk. By focusing on the distinct art unit, the applicant can ensure that the arguments are well-aligned with the specific mechanical engineering standards applied by the examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PORTER, RACHEL L | 1 | 21.2% | +23.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18878829 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A TRUE HEALTH-WELLNESS STATUS OF A USER | PORTER, RACHEL L | 50d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18878829 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A TRUE HEALTH-WELLNESS STATUS OF A USER | PORTER, RACHEL L | 50d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3684 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18878829 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A TRUE HEALTH-WELLNESS STATUS OF A USER | PORTER, RACHEL L | 3684 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | 50d overdue | Pending | Dec 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial