Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Glatt Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Glatt Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung is currently managing 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, which indicates that each active case is receiving an independent review from a different official. Interestingly, while there are three different examiners involved, they are situated within only 2 distinct art units. This suggests that the company's medical device technology is concentrated within a few specific technical groups, even though the individual cases are being handled by a variety of personnel. The medical device sector often requires addressing both functional and structural claim elements.

The busiest examiner, HO, ANNA THI, is currently responsible for 1 pending office action. In the context of the 3 pending office actions total, this means the workload is evenly spread, with no single examiner holding a majority of the cases. For the applicant, the challenge lies in navigating the 2 distinct art units while addressing the unique perspectives of 3 distinct examiners. This structure requires a cohesive strategy that ensures consistency across the art units, despite the 1 pending office action per examiner distribution. This distribution ensures that each of the 3 pending office actions receives dedicated attention.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HO, ANNA THI 1 39.3% +34.6%
GITMAN, GABRIEL E 1 76.2% +20.3%
KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 1 63.3% +21.6%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18249453 Nozzle for Spraying Substances and Method for the Open-Loop or Closed-Loop Control of the Nozzle KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 38d overdue
19101734 Nozzle Assembly HO, ANNA THI —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18249453 Nozzle for Spraying Substances and Method for the Open-Loop or Closed-Loop Control of the Nozzle KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 38d overdue
19101734 Nozzle Assembly HO, ANNA THI —
18690478 Process Gas Preparation Device and Procedure for Preparing Process Gas GITMAN, GABRIEL E —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3752 2
1772 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19101734 Nozzle Assembly HO, ANNA THI 3752 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 06, 2025
18690478 Process Gas Preparation Device and Procedure for Preparing Process Gas GITMAN, GABRIEL E 1772 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 08, 2024
18249453 Nozzle for Spraying Substances and Method for the Open-Loop or Closed-Loop Control of the Nozzle KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 3752 §102§112 Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending Apr 18, 2023

Managing Glatt Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Glatt Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung have?

Glatt Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Glatt Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung applications?

Anna Thi Ho has the most, with 1 of Glatt Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung's pending office actions.

What technology area are Glatt Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month