Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (50%) |
| §112 only | 1 (17%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 2 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEVY, BRANDON WILLIAM | 1 | 62.0% | +48.1% |
| TURKOWSKI, KAYLA MARIE | 1 | 64.8% | +51.0% |
| BASQUILL, SEAN M | 1 | 38.8% | +21.7% |
| MARCETICH, ADAM M | 1 | 72.6% | +18.8% |
| TOTH, KAREN E | 1 | 46.7% | +25.4% |
| KIM, SAMUEL CHONG | 1 | 48.5% | +70.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18072024 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING AN OCULAR IMPLANT TO THE SUPRACHOROIDAL SPACE WITHIN AN EYE | MARCETICH, ADAM M | 29d |
| 18913142 | INSERTION SYSTEM FOR DELIVERY OF ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL AGENTS INSIDE THE EYE | LEVY, BRANDON WILLIAM | — |
| 18407936 | DRUG DELIVERY IMPLANTS WITH BI-DIRECTIONAL DELIVERY CAPACITY AND METHODS OF USING SAME | TURKOWSKI, KAYLA MARIE | — |
| 18359642 | OPHTHALMIC TOPICAL CREAM FORMULATIONS AND USES THEREOF | BASQUILL, SEAN M | — |
| 17844497 | INTRAOCULAR PHYSIOLOGICAL SENSOR | TOTH, KAREN E | — |
| 17128989 | ON-DEMAND INTRAOCULAR PHYSIOLOGICAL SENSOR WITH TRABECULAR BYPASS FLOW | KIM, SAMUEL CHONG | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 2 |
| 3783 | 1 |
| 1614 | 1 |
| 3781 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18913142 | INSERTION SYSTEM FOR DELIVERY OF ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL AGENTS INSIDE THE EYE | LEVY, BRANDON WILLIAM | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 11, 2024 |
| 18407936 | DRUG DELIVERY IMPLANTS WITH BI-DIRECTIONAL DELIVERY CAPACITY AND METHODS OF USING SAME | TURKOWSKI, KAYLA MARIE | 3783 | §103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 09, 2024 |
| 18359642 | OPHTHALMIC TOPICAL CREAM FORMULATIONS AND USES THEREOF | BASQUILL, SEAN M | 1614 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 26, 2023 |
| 18072024 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING AN OCULAR IMPLANT TO THE SUPRACHOROIDAL SPACE WITHIN AN EYE | MARCETICH, ADAM M | 3781 | §103DP | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Nov 30, 2022 |
| 17844497 | INTRAOCULAR PHYSIOLOGICAL SENSOR | TOTH, KAREN E | 3791 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 20, 2022 |
| 17128989 | ON-DEMAND INTRAOCULAR PHYSIOLOGICAL SENSOR WITH TRABECULAR BYPASS FLOW | KIM, SAMUEL CHONG | 3791 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 21, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial