Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Glean Technologies Inc.

Technology area: Computing & Software

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Glean Technologies Inc. is currently overseeing 4 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. This portfolio is spread across 4 distinct art units, reflecting a variety of technical focuses within the company's software projects. The prosecution involves 4 distinct examiners, which means that every one of the 4 pending office actions is being handled by a different person.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is LE, HUNG D, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 4 distinct examiners for 4 pending office actions, no single examiner has a larger share of the workload than any other. This requires the company to manage 4 separate examiner relationships to move its current applications in the Computing & Software field toward issuance.

The fact that 4 distinct art units are involved indicates that the company's 4 pending office actions are technically distinct from one another. Practitioners must be prepared for 4 different examination styles, as each examiner will bring their own interpretation to the specific art unit they represent. This decentralized prosecution environment requires coordination to ensure consistent results across the 4 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (67%)
§103 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LE, HUNG D 1 90.1% +6.4%
HERSHLEY, MARK E 1 78.4% +18.6%
WILLOUGHBY, ALICIA M 1 53.9% +25.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19297525 Enterprise-Aware Data Security Posture Management Using Contextualized Access Intelligence LE, HUNG D —
18467724 INTELLIGENT GROUPING OF MESSAGES INTO CONVERSATION DOCUMENTS FOR RANKING AND RETRIEVAL WILLOUGHBY, ALICIA M —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19069486 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR MONITORING AND OPTIMIZING ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PLATFORM USING NON-PERSONALLY-IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION IN LOGS HERSHLEY, MARK E 10d overdue
18467724 INTELLIGENT GROUPING OF MESSAGES INTO CONVERSATION DOCUMENTS FOR RANKING AND RETRIEVAL WILLOUGHBY, ALICIA M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2161 1
2164 1
2156 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19297525 Enterprise-Aware Data Security Posture Management Using Contextualized Access Intelligence LE, HUNG D 2161 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 12, 2025
19069486 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR MONITORING AND OPTIMIZING ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PLATFORM USING NON-PERSONALLY-IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION IN LOGS HERSHLEY, MARK E 2164 §103Other Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Mar 04, 2025
18467724 INTELLIGENT GROUPING OF MESSAGES INTO CONVERSATION DOCUMENTS FOR RANKING AND RETRIEVAL WILLOUGHBY, ALICIA M 2156 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 14, 2023

Managing Glean Technologies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Glean Technologies Inc. have?

Glean Technologies Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Glean Technologies Inc. applications?

Hung D Le has the most, with 1 of Glean Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Glean Technologies Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month