Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Glencore Ltd.

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Glencore Ltd. maintains a highly concentrated prosecution profile with 1 pending office action currently active. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ensuring that the company's current intellectual property efforts are reviewed by a single point of contact. The data indicates 0 distinct art units, which may point to a specific administrative status or a stage in the filing process where an art unit has not been finalized.

RUMP, RICHARD M is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Since this 1 action is the only one pending for the company, the examiner's individual assessment will be the sole factor in the immediate outcome of the prosecution. This level of concentration simplifies the management of the portfolio but increases the impact of any single procedural hurdle encountered during the examination process.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RUMP, RICHARD M 1 74.6% +20.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18632809 RECOVERY OF LITHIUM FROM LITHIUM IRON PHOSPHATE BLACK MASS RUMP, RICHARD M —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18632809 RECOVERY OF LITHIUM FROM LITHIUM IRON PHOSPHATE BLACK MASS RUMP, RICHARD M —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18632809 RECOVERY OF LITHIUM FROM LITHIUM IRON PHOSPHATE BLACK MASS RUMP, RICHARD M — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 11, 2024

Managing Glencore Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month