Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days
Glenfly Tech Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. Because the portfolio's active prosecution is limited to this instance, the company's current experience at the patent office is centralized under a point of review. This concentration means that the technical subject matter has been categorized within a specific specialized division of the communications sector.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is TZENG, FRED, who is handling 1 pending office action. As the examiner involved, TZENG, FRED manages the company's pending workload in this technology area. The fact that there is 1 distinct art unit involved confirms that the technical subject matter of this specific filing is being evaluated by a department, rather than being spread across various areas of the patent office.
With 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy for Glenfly Tech Co. Ltd. is focused on a proceeding. The practitioner's interactions are limited to 1 distinct examiner, making the individual preferences and past history of TZENG, FRED a primary factor in the outcome. This concentration in the distinct art unit simplifies the administrative tracking of the portfolio but places the weight of the company's current communications prosecution on the decisions made within that specific unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TZENG, FRED | 1 | 86.8% | +4.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19324971 | IMAGE COMPENSATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER DEVICE, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | TZENG, FRED | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19324971 | IMAGE COMPENSATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER DEVICE, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | TZENG, FRED | 2625 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 10, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialGlenfly Tech Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Fred Tzeng has the most, with 1 of Glenfly Tech Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
