Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Glw Inc.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Glw Inc. currently manages 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, indicating a prosecution landscape where each action is handled in a separate administrative unit. Such a distribution suggests that the company's intellectual property covers a range of specific technical niches within its primary field, rather than being concentrated in a single department.

LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Given that the total number of pending office actions is 3, this individual's workload represents a specific portion of the company's active prosecution pipeline. Practitioners should note that with the distinct art units involved, there is no centralized examination authority for these filings, requiring tailored strategies for each individual examiner and unit.

The parity between the 3 pending office actions and the 3 distinct examiners highlights a lack of examiner overlap. This ratio between actions and examiners means that no examiner's prior decisions or preferences will necessarily influence multiple active cases. Consequently, the prosecution of these active matters will likely proceed independently across the distinct art units involved, requiring the practitioner to manage three separate examiner relationships simultaneously.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 1 73.8% +29.9%
ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO 1 61.3% +35.1%
BATES, DAVID W 1 76.4% +16.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19324731 IMPROVEMENTS IN BONE SCREWS LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES —
18794430 HOLDERS, KITS, AND METHODS ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18196210 Orthopedic Screw with Radiolucent and Radiopaque Thread Portions BATES, DAVID W 11d overdue
19324731 IMPROVEMENTS IN BONE SCREWS LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES —
18794430 HOLDERS, KITS, AND METHODS ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3619 1
3736 1
3799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19324731 IMPROVEMENTS IN BONE SCREWS LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 3619 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2025
18794430 HOLDERS, KITS, AND METHODS ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO 3736 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 05, 2024
18196210 Orthopedic Screw with Radiolucent and Radiopaque Thread Portions BATES, DAVID W 3799 §103 Non-Final OA 11d overdue Pending May 11, 2023

Managing Glw Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Glw Inc. have?

Glw Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Glw Inc. applications?

Matthew James Lawson has the most, with 1 of Glw Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Glw Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month