Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
GM Global Technology Operations LLC has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. Prosecution is currently handled by 1 distinct examiner working within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration of resources indicates that the company's current pending matters are focused on a specific technical niche rather than being distributed across multiple departments.
The presence of 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action allows for a direct line of communication between the applicant and the patent office. This structure avoids the complexity of managing multiple examiner personalities or conflicting procedural requirements. Practitioners can tailor their approach specifically to the history and preferences of the assigned examiner.
MATHEW, ISWARYA is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. As the only examiner currently assigned to the company's pending workload, MATHEW, ISWARYA is the sole individual responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending action. The outcome of the company's current prosecution efforts depends entirely on the resolution of this single matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MATHEW, ISWARYA | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18316836 | METHODS OF MANUFACTURING LITHIUM METAL NEGATIVE ELECTRODES AND BATTERIES INCLUDING THE SAME | MATHEW, ISWARYA | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1788 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18316836 | METHODS OF MANUFACTURING LITHIUM METAL NEGATIVE ELECTRODES AND BATTERIES INCLUDING THE SAME | MATHEW, ISWARYA | 1788 | §103 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | May 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial