Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Goldwind Science & Technology Co. Ltd. manages a company patent portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area. The portfolio currently includes 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly concentrated prosecution effort where all current activity is localized under one individual in a specific department at the USPTO.
BROWN, MICHAEL J is the busiest examiner for the portfolio and is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. The 1 to 1 ratio between the busiest examiner's workload and the total pending actions confirms that there is no distribution of work across multiple examiners. The 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's computing technology is classified within a narrow technical field.
Practitioners should note that the entire active portfolio is subject to the discretion of 1 distinct examiner. The outcome of the 1 pending office action will significantly impact the company's standing in the Computing & Software sector. Because there is only 1 distinct art unit, the examination process is highly focused on the standards of that specific unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN, MICHAEL J | 1 | 87.9% | +8.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18684738 | POWER GRID FREQUENCY DETECTION METHOD, APPARATUS, POWER GRID FREQUENCY ADJUSTMENT METHOD, AND APPARATUS | BROWN, MICHAEL J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2115 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18684738 | POWER GRID FREQUENCY DETECTION METHOD, APPARATUS, POWER GRID FREQUENCY ADJUSTMENT METHOD, AND APPARATUS | BROWN, MICHAEL J | 2115 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial